Design quality review on construction drawings and specs.

The full record: every specification section, every drawing sheet, plus addenda, special provisions, and RFI answers conformed into one governing set. The review plans one agent per section and per sheet, so coverage is complete rather than sampled.

The agent plans the review from the project itself. It reads requirements in context, checks the handoffs between disciplines, and inspects drawing evidence visually instead of matching words. Your own QA checklists can be added as skills and run alongside the project-driven plan.

See why a chat window over a folder of PDFs is not document control.

Every candidate finding faces a second, independently scoped agent whose only job is to disprove it. The agent also searches the whole project before filing anything as missing, and repeated defects are consolidated into one issue. Rejected findings are archived with their reasoning so you can audit the calls.

A ranked issue register with rework and risk cost exposure, filterable by discipline, severity, and type. Every finding opens on the cited specification paragraph or drawing location, and each one can be confirmed, dismissed, or downgraded by your reviewer.

At every milestone. Teams run the highest-risk handoffs at 50 percent, drawing-led coordination review at 90 percent, and the exhaustive deep review before issue for construction. All formats file into the same issue queue, so later runs build on earlier decisions.

Yes. Caltrans, WSDOT, FDOT, UFGS, and BNSF formats are already in production, along with special provisions amended into standard sections. The review works from the conformed record, whatever format the owner issues. Spec intelligence is that conformed book.

UFGS and DOT specs

There is no universal ranking. Score the job: conflicts between drawings and specifications caught before construction, a conformed book, findings cited to the section and the sheet, and one record that continues into submittals and closeout. Specset is built for that job.

General contractors and engineers of record review the specifications and the drawings as one set, before the bid is priced and before the set is issued for construction. Specset inventories every section and sheet, plans the review by discipline, and files conflicts, code issues, missing information, and constructability risks with citations. A reviewer confirms, downgrades, or rejects each finding.

Specset does not rank other products, and it does not claim a measured win over any of them. Score the job. Specset reviews construction drawings and specifications together, from a conformed book, with findings cited to the paragraph and the sheet, then carries the same record into submittal review and closeout. Design-only plan checkers are what buyers compare when the question is the drawing set. GC field and submittal tools are what buyers compare when the question is packages and the jobsite after the design is issued.

Manual design QC is a team reading the project manual and the sheets, often across several rounds, and still missing conflicts between a specification and a drawing. Specset runs an automated first pass over the full set: every section and every sheet, conformed with addenda and special provisions, returned as a ranked issue register with the source open. Reviewers still confirm or dismiss each finding. Teams run the highest-risk handoffs at 50 percent, a drawing-led coordination review at 90 percent, and an exhaustive pass before issue for construction.

Yes. Design quality review, submittal review, and closeout read one project record. The conformed specification is the text those workflows cite, so a finding filed against a section or a sheet is still on the record when submittals and closeout are reviewed. Spec intelligence is the conformed book.